FCDO is responsible for collating data and reporting spend on ODA to the Organisation of Economic Development and Co-operation (OECD), including the 0.7% ODA:GNI ratio commitment. The FY 2021 Congressional Budget Justification describes the funding required for State and USAID to carry out our missions worldwide. The increase in bilateral spend was the largest increase seen since 2016, when the UK switched to the ESA 2010 methodology for GNI estimates, 3,066 million of bilateral ODA was delivered through multilateral organisations, an increase of 294 million compared to 2018. The Government also announced a one-off supplement of $304.7 million for the COVID-19 response in the Pacific and Timor . The UKs ODA spend is only slightly affected by this change as most of its ODA is issued through grants. U.S. Foreign Assistance by Country. Its worth noting that, like other multilateral organisations, core contributions to IDA are based on multi-year commitments which may not be uniformly spread across years, four of the top 5 receiving organisations of UK multilateral ODA in 2019 were among the top 5 multilaterals in 2018. , z is not applicable, 0 is null and ~ is less than half the smallest unit displayed. Total ODA from DAC country donors in 2019 was 119.7 billion (grant-equivalent measure), an increase from 115.1 billion in 2018. DWP spend also includes ODA-eligible benefits to refugees within the first 12 months of stay in the UK as part of the Vulnerable Persons Resettlement (VPR) programme. The government reduced its annual aid budget from 0.7% of gross national income (GNI), which is a measure of the amount produced by the economy, to 0.5% this year. In 2020, Britain spent 14.5bn on foreign aid, a figure that meets the 0.7 per cent target, according to provisional data published by the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office in April. A separate 1m Humanitarian Emergency Fund also provides humanitarian funding to support crises as they occur, including during 2019 support for Mozambique, Malawi and Zimbabwe following Cyclone Idai, and for the Ebola crisis in the Demographic Republic of Congo. And because the economy grew in 2019, aid spending rose in line with national income from 14.5 billion to 15.2 billion an increase of 645 million (4.4%) compared to 2018. The top 3 recipients of Humanitarian Aid spend were Yemen (219m), Syria (194m) and Bangladesh (125m). Where we do have to revise information included in this publication, we will follow the procedures set out in our revisions policy. , As defined on the OECD DAC list of ODA-eligible international organisations, For some multi-country/region programmes, the current administrative system does not allow recording of spend by individual recipients. ODA spend allocated to Africa increased by 125 million increase in 2019 to 2,989 million, whilst the percentage share remained similar to the share in 2018 (50.6%), (Figure 4). Foreign aid may be given as a signal of diplomatic approval, or to strengthen a military ally. These shares should be taken as indicative estimates rather than exact amounts of funding, and they are dependent upon multilateral organisations returning disbursement data to the DAC. Australia's Official Development Assistance (ODA) will remain at $4 billion in 2020-21, down $44 million from last year and in line with the Government's freeze on aid funding expected to remain in place until 2022-23.. Figure 13 legend: DFIDs and Other Government Departments and Other Contributors of ODA (non-DFID) spend by sector, 2019 ( million). Figure 1 shows the total amount of UK ODA spending each year since 1970. Humanitarian Aid - 1,536 million (15.0% of total UK bilateral ODA). This is largely driven by contributions to a Reconstruction Trust fund, Democratic Republic of Congo (Congo, Dem. Spend increased by 56 million on 2018 to 207 million in 2019. According to the OECD analysis of donors provisional 2019 ODA spend, the increase is attributable to bilateral aid to low income countries rising[footnote 23]. In 2019, frontline diplomatic activity (the FCOs administrative costs not included elsewhere, which are reported under FCO spend as Aid-related frontline diplomacy in support of aid flows to ) were reported at the country level compared to recent years when they were reported at the regional level. It supports them to deal with the impacts of climate change by building their capacity to act themselves and by catalysing large scale public and private finance investments. The Development Tracker can be used to explore details of the individual development projects that the UK is funding. Office for National Statistics technical assistance to build capacity of statistical systems in developing countries. Dark blue = Pakistan, light blue = Ethiopia, grey = Afghanistan, pink = Yemen, teal = Nigeria. This decrease was partly due to smaller spend in the Caribbean. This section covers ODA spend from the FCOs core budget. While FCO remained the largest spender of Cross-Government Prosperity Fund ODA (accounting for 49.7%), DFIDs share rose from 12.3% in 2018 to 36.9% in 2019. The majority of non-DFID country-specific ODA was channelled to Middle Income Countries 71.5% (440m to LMICs and 412m to UMICs), LDCs and Other LICs received 339 million of non-DFID bilateral ODA in 2019, this was an increase of 112 million compared to 2018. For the 2019 ODA:GNI ratio, the GNI estimate is based on the pre-Blue Book 2019 framework since the first quarterly estimate of 2019 GNI under the new framework did not become available until 30 September 2019. The British government has ended direct bilateral aid to more than 100 countries and territories, according to a Devex analysis of a letter written by Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab. By . Seven of the top ten country-specific ODA increases from 2018 were seen in LDC/Other LICs (Yemen, Bangladesh, South Sudan, Uganda, Afghanistan, Mozambique and Zambia), LDCs and Other LICs continue to account for the largest proportion of bilateral country-specific ODA spend in 2019 at 56.4%, UK ODA to LMICs represented 29.7 per cent (1,488m) of UK country specific bilateral ODA in 2019, compared to 32.3% (1,458m) in 2018, total UK bilateral ODA received by UMICs increased by 136 million to 694 million in 2019. Other major changes in top 10 country-specific rankings, Figure 7: Rank of top 10 recipients of country-specific 2019 UK bilateral ODA. There are two types of bilateral ODA: Core multilateral ODA is un-earmarked funding from national governments to multilateral organisations[footnote 4], which are pooled with other donors funding and disbursed as part of the core budget of the multilateral organisation[footnote 5]. UK foreign aid spending in 2021/22. Individual departments that bid for funding are accountable for their own spending and delivery under the given fund. Section 4.1 provides a detailed breakdown of ODA spending by recipient region and country; section 4.2 provides a breakdown of ODA spending by sector (for example, health or humanitarian aid); and section 4.3 provides a breakdown of ODA spending to multilateral organisations. This could have an impact on the recent trends of some recipient countries. Other government departments will continue to publish throughout this period. , For breakdowns of spend to the top 20 recipients, see Table 6 on the publication landing page. For example the UKs contribution to the World Bank International Development Association. FCO remained the largest spender of CSSF ODA funds, (69.1% of total CSSF ODA). According to a note from OECD, the top countries that donated money in 2020 are the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, Japan, and France. Spend in 2019 increased from 2018, with total bilateral ODA received by Asia being 126 million higher than the previous peak in 2016. In 2021, the United States budgeted $38 billion for foreign aid spending. To understand more about ODA eligible Gift Aid, please see methodology note. In dark blue are the proportions of UK bilateral ODA by region in 2015, in light blue are the proportions of UK bilateral ODA by region in 2019. Office for Statistics Regulation published their finding from the compliance check of SID which confirmed that it is designated a National Statistics. Figures released by the Foreign Office yesterday revealed that China . Conflict, Stability and Security Fund (CSSF). The increase in capital will be used to make investments in Africa and South Asia, ODA spend by departments other than DFID (Other Government Departments - OGDs) and other contributors of UK ODA (referred to collectively in Table 2 as non-DFID spend) was 4,090 million in 2019, an increase of 434 million, or 11.9%, on 2018, ODA spend by Other Government Departments was the driver behind the increase in non-DFID ODA, with the top 7 highest spending departments all spending more when compared with 2018. . Unsurprisingly, the continent received the largest share of the UK's ODA budget in 2019 with US$4.2 billion. Private spending or donations made to support developing countries, for example by the public, the voluntary sector or through remittances, are not part of the ODA definition and not covered in this publication. As the data in the publication is largely based on administrative data it is not subject to sampling error. Figure 3 legend: A) Percentage of UK ODA spend by DFID, Other Government Departments (OGDs) and Other UK Contributors (Other Contributors) in 2015 (dark blue), 2018 (light blue) and 2019 (grey). Figure 12 legend: Major Sector Spend comparison between 2018 and 2019 bilateral ODA ( millions). This support relates to the provision of publicly-funded education services for asylum seekers of compulsory school age. The Prime Minister will walk into the G7 summit as the only leader who is cutting development aid to the world's poorest. The commitment to spend 0.7% of GNI on ODA has been met, UK ODA was 15,197 million, an increase of 645 million (4.4% increase) on 2018, bilateral through multilateral: this is earmarked ODA spent through multilateral organisations. Total bilateral ODA=10.3 billion, of which 4.4 billion (42.4%) is spent in unspecified countries/regions. The Telegraph. Figure 8: Country-specific bilateral ODA by Income Group, 2009-2019. UK foreign aid spending in 2016. The majority of which went to the health sector, primarily for basic and reproductive healthcare, in 2019, Bangladesh was the sixth largest recipient of UK bilateral country-specific ODA, up from eighth in 2018. See our technical note for more information. Telephone: 01355 84 36 51. Figures for DAC donors final 2019 ODA will be published in December. , The Global Partnership for Education is an example of a sectoral-specific fund where amounts allocated to countries is not known in advance. Multilateral Aid: When multiple governments pool resources in cooperation with organizations like the World Bank, the IMF, and the UN. The grey section represents the proportion of total UK ODA that was channelled as core contributions to multilaterals, Core Multilateral. BEISs ODA includes spend on International Climate Finance, jointly managed with FCDO and DEFRA. The ONS publishes revisions to GNI estimates as more economic data becomes available. Figure 16: Provisional ODA from DAC Donors, 2019. Figure 15: Bilateral ODA by Income Group for the Major Sectors, 2019. This is partly due to there being no contribution to the IMF- Poverty Reduction Growth Trust Fund in 2019, compared to a contribution of 120 million in 2015, in 5 of the 15 top recipient countries, the UK contributed 15% or more of total DAC donor ODA: Ethiopia, Nigeria, Democratic Republic of Congo, Yemen and Pakistan. In 2020, the most recent year for which the data is complete, military aid accounted for 23% of all foreign aid spending - the smallest share since 2004 - while economic assistance accounted . In 2014, China's aid flows were officially estimated at over $4 billion per yearsimilar in volume to Canada or Norway, and about a third of the size of the UK's aid budget. It supports the UKs aim of promoting global prosperity, creating the broad-based and inclusive growth needed for poverty reduction, contributing to the UN Sustainable Development Goals. To illustrate the impact of using provisional figures, DAC members provisional ODA for 2018 was 114.7 billion. A more detailed breakdown of the broad sectors is given in Additional Table A7. The 2021 federal budget announced an additional $1.4 billion for international assistance over five years. The UK aid budget sits at around 11 billion, which includes 4 billion going to multilateral . DFID spend in dark blue and non-DFID spend in grey. 3. For more details see background note on ODA spending and reporting. Figure 4 legend: UK bilateral ODA by receiving region ( millions), 2009 2019. This spending is helping developing countries reduce their emissions in line with the ambition set out in the Paris Agreement. Charts and tables (data up to 2019) from the Report: Development Aid at a Glance 2021. For more detail on the grant-equivalent impact on other donors see Final SID 2018. UK ODA can be classified into sectors depending on its purpose, e.g. Since 2013, UK ODA has continued to increase in line with growth in the UKs GNI. The ODA:GNI ratio presents the amount of UK Official Development Assistance (ODA) as a proportion of Gross National Income (GNI). Largest donors of humanitarian aid worldwide 2022, by country. Dark blue = LDCs/Other LICs (Least Developed Countries/Other Low Income Countries), light blue = LMICs (Lower Middle Income Countries), grey = UMICs (Upper Middle Income Countries). Budget Review 2020-21 Index. C. Other = Other contributors of UK ODA, Scottish Government, Other In-Donor Refugee Costs, Colonial Pensions administered by DFID and Welsh Government. When DFID or other UK government departments provide core funding to multilateral organisations, the funding is pooled with other donors funding and disbursed as part of the core budget of the multilaterals. Erratic budget processes threaten US foreign aid. Programmes involved providing humanitarian assistance such as immediate relief and emergency food, Nigeria saw the largest decrease in bilateral ODA compared to all other recipients, with spend decreasing from 297 million in 2018 to 258 million in 2019 (the next largest decrease was Pakistan by 26m). The Scottish Government, though its 10M pa International Development Fund, supports development work in its partner countries Malawi, Zambia, Rwanda and Pakistan, in pursuit of the Global Goals. 4 minutes read. Over 5 years: Africa has consistently received the largest amount of UK ODA. UK bilateral ODA spend was 9,533 million (65.8% of total UK . DWP pays an annual core contribution to the International Labour Organisation (ILO). The UK government has been signed up to the target since 1974, but reached it for the first . This allows you to filter projects by country and sector and view further details about the project as published in documents such as the business case and annual review. Further information on the data sources, quality and processing of the statistics in this publication are found in Annexes 1-3 on the Statistics on International Development webpage. This sector has seen the largest increase in 2019 compared to 2018 - 237 million more than in 2018. The UK spend is highlighted in turquoise with the other donors in dark blue. the donor has specified where and/or what the ODA is spent on this is usually ODA going to specific countries, regions or programmes. This spend in the top 5 countries represents 28.3% of the total country-specific UK bilateral ODA in 2019, a slight reduction from 2018 when they comprised 31.2% of the total (Figure 6), in 2019 the top 3 recipients of UK bilateral country specific ODA were Pakistan (305m), Ethiopia (300m) and Afghanistan (292m) (Figure 6). The portfolio aims are delivered through a mix of researcher-led and commissioned calls delivered by NIHR and through partnerships with other global health research funders, through initiatives to develop and advance global health research. This represents 0.5% of expected gross national income (GNI) and is a reduction in aid spending from the legislative target of 0.7%. The percentage share of total bilateral ODA of the five largest sectors in 2019 was 66.3%, a slight increase from 2018 (67.8%). Due to an update to its financial systems, the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) is temporarily unable to update DevTracker. View full size version of infographic: In 2019 the UK provided 15.2bn of Official Development Assistance. This administrative source comprises 73.1% of total UK ODA in 2019, non-DFID sources, who also assess whether the spend is in line with the OECD definitions of ODA. Aid spending was an estimated 3 billion lower in 2021 than 2020 (14.5 billion versus 11.5 Foreign aid by country 2022. 2. . Ian Blackford, 9 June 2021. In 2019, 659 million was delivered through the fund, an increase of 54 million compared to 2018. Non-DAC members included in the OECD's publishing are listed separately. The quality assurance Annex 3 describes the steps that have been taken by FCDO statisticians to minimise these kinds of input errors, and to produce UK ODA statistics. In dark blue is the 2019 ODA:GNI ratio and in grey is 2018 ratio. It includes all low, lower-middle and upper-middle income countries, except for those that are members of the G8 or the European Union (including countries with a firm accession date for EU membership). DFID considered several factors and consulted with key stakeholders, ONS and HM Treasury when determining its approach for implementing the new framework for reporting on the ODA:GNI ratio. Thursday, March 2nd, 2023 2:19am. For comparability, UK ODA data by recipient countries is also for 2018. The report released on Saturday, October 29 says that is because a large percentage of the money set aside for aid is being spent on housing and supporting refugees. The Government slashed the foreign aid budget from 0.7% to 0.5% of UK national income in 2021. . See SID 2018 p.35 case study for more information on Developing Country Unspecified spend. Britain will only spend . Wed like to set additional cookies to understand how you use GOV.UK, remember your settings and improve government services. Between the spring and the autumn, the previous years ODA spending of government departments are finalised. ODA is defined as resource flows to developing countries and multilateral organisations, which are provided by official agencies (e.g. You have accepted additional cookies. 17 That level of per capita spending exceeded any other OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) country during 2018-21. We will be reaching out to users via the Statistics at FCDO page to help us plan future developments and meet users analytical needs as far as possible. The Government has spent around 1 billion of the aid budget on refugees inside the UK in 2021, including millions of pounds a day on hotel feels, a scathing report by the . In 2019, UK bilateral ODA received by Afghanistan increased compared with 2018 to 292 million (an increase of 43m) (Figure 6). In 2019, non-DFID ODA contributors spent 699 million in Asia, accounting for 44.8% of their total spend. The President's Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 Budget Request for the State Department and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is $60.4 billion, which includes $29.4 billion for USAID fully and partially managed accounts, $1.7 billion (6 percent) above the FY 2022 Request. The Joint Funds are covered separately as a whole, regardless of which Government Department spends the money. Figure 3: Breakdown of UK ODA by contributor (2015, 2018 and 2019). DFID data for this publication is based on an extract of the ARIES database taken in June 2019, after the end of the calendar year 2019 and financial year 2019/20. In addition, the CSSFs Rapid Response Mechanism allows funding to be released immediately, across government departments to respond to a crisis. The top 3 spending sectors in this area were Public Sector Policy and Administrative Management (217m), Civilian Peace-Building, Conflict Prevention and Resolution (199m) and Media and free flow of information (119m). The Biden-Harris Administration's Request is a . For a full breakdown of UK-ODA by government department and other contributors to UK ODA by delivery channel for 2015, 2018 and 2019 please see Table 10. Figure 15 summarises the differences in the main sectors of 2019 UK bilateral ODA spend between countries of different income groups. 2019: Bilateral ODA to Africa increased by 125 million from 2,863 million in 2018 to 2,989 million in 2019, increasing by 4.4% (Figure 4). Ethiopia was the largest among the African countries and second overall with around US$417 million. Bilateral ODA to Europe has increased from 55 million in 2015 to 189 million in 2019. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) implemented a new methodology for calculating GDP in its September 2019 Blue Book (the UK National Account statistics), that in turn had an impact on Gross National Income (GNI). For media enquiries please contact the FCDO Press Office on +44 (0)20 7008 3100. Over 5 years: Like the Americas, ODA spend in Europe[footnote 12] is small compared to Asia and Africa. The Statistics on International Development: Provisional Aid Spend 2019 publication outlines provisional ODA spend information and an estimate of GNI for 2019 published by ONS in March to calculate a provisional estimate of the ODA:GNI ratio. This approach is in line with how DFID dealt with the last major GNI methodology change[footnote 29] and provides consistency between the in-year monitoring and reporting of the ODA:GNI ratio. This is similar to 2017, of the 5 countries receiving the greatest amount of total DAC donor ODA (Afghanistan, Syria, India, Bangladesh and Ethiopia), three (Ethiopia, Afghanistan and Syria) were among the top five recipients of UK ODA. In 2019, 57.6% (5,908m) of the UKs bilateral ODA was allocated to a specific country or region. In 2019, the UK was one of 5 DAC donors along with Denmark, Luxembourg, Norway and Sweden to either meet or exceed the UNs target of an ODA:GNI ratio of 0.7%. The DAC reviews the list every 3 years. A new report from the cross-party Commons international development committee of MPs hits out at the use of the Foreign . This was partly driven by frontline diplomacy, Yemen (fourth largest recipient of UK ODA in 2019) saw the largest increase in bilateral ODA spend, increasing by 56.5% from 166 million in 2018 to 260 million in 2019, surpassing the spend in 2017 (205m) (Figure 6). In 2015 the International Development (Official Development Assistance Target) Act placed the 0.7% commitment in UK law from 2015 and in each subsequent calendar year. The size of the dots corresponds to the total amount of ODA spent in each income groups sector. In 2022, the United States government donated over 12 billion U.S. dollars in humanitarian aid worldwide. This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. All data tables included in this report are available to download in spreadsheet format. The bars for each year represent 100% of total UK ODA spend. The central theme of 2022 was the U.S. government's deploying of its sanctions, AML . Education (for compulsory school age) and healthcare for asylum seekers based in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Non-DFID contributors also spent a larger proportion of their ODA in Europe and the Americas (19.9%), compared to DFID (2.8%). However, a closer examination of recent trends and the latest federal budget reveals a grimmer picture. Figure 14 provides an overview of the highest spending sector for each of the top 10 recipient countries of UK bilateral ODA in 2019. [footnote 19]. Information on the main definitions and sources used in this publication can be found in Annexes 2 and 3 respectively of the Statistics on International Development publication. As of this reporting, it has disbursed over $32 billion. Dark blue = Africa, light blue = Asia, grey = Americas, pink = Europe, teal = Pacific. A glossary, explaining key terms used throughout this report, is available in Annex 1, See commitments made by the UK and other donors at the 2005 G8 Summit in Gleneagles, For more information on the grant equivalent measure and the impact on UK ODA, see background note 6.2, The multilateral must be on the OECD DAC list of eligible multilaterals in order to receive unearmarked funding. The first table is based on official development assistance (ODA) figures published by the OECD for members of its Development Assistance Committee (DAC). During a consultation conducted in 2014, users told us that they use the statistics for a variety of purposes: preparing material for briefs; PQs and public correspondence; inclusion in reports and reviews and providing data for research and monitoring. For example, the International Development Association (IDA), which is part of the World Bank Group, has been one of the largest recipients of UK multilateral ODA since 2013 and the UK remains its biggest donor. This was primarily driven by an increase in humanitarian aid spending (45m increase on 2018) with material relief assistance and services being provided for Rohingya refugees, Tanzania moved out of the top 10 recipients of UK bilateral ODA, this was partly driven by a decrease in spend to programmes focused on social and economic infrastructure and services (Figure 7), total UK bilateral ODA received by LDCs and Other LICs increased by 13.1% (328m) from 2,496 million in 2018 to 2,823 million in 2019 (Figure 8). Canada - Unlike other countries, Canada has taken a unique feminist approach. In 2021, UK aid spending fell 21% compared to 2020 to stand at 11.4 billion. , Please see Table C6 in Excel Tables: Statistics on International Development 2019 for underlying data, From 2017, a single project could allocate spend to one or more sectors codes. See Annex 1 for more information on what is included in each sector level. They are published prior to the release of final ODA statistics by the OECD DAC for all OECD members. Figure 5: Map of UK Bilateral ODA Spend by Recipient Country: 2019. View full size version of infographic: Case Study 1 - Yemen. The most significant reduction was seen in Turkey (16.3m decrease since 2018) reversing previous increases in funding (2016 and 2017) to support displaced refugees during the Syria Crisis. This was the largest year-on-year increase compared to the other income groups, 43.0% of spend within this category consists of project-type interventions and includes expenditure on multi-country or multi-region projects. Spend to these countries accounted for 17.9% of total country-specific UK bilateral ODA, Pakistan has remained the top recipient of UK bilateral ODA for the fifth consecutive year. 2019 spend coloured in dark blue, 2018 spend in light blue. This was mostly due to an increase in humanitarian aid spend, with the largest country specific increase to Yemen (see Case Study 1, p. 32, for a more detailed look at the story in Yemen). It is therefore not possible to directly track the use of UK core multilateral funding. The latest edition of this publication can be found on GOV.UK, final UK Aid spend is usually published in the autumn. FCDO will move to the new framework at the start of 2020, the next full calendar year, for managing and reporting 2020 ODA spend. Table 4. It will take only 2 minutes to fill in. Bilateral ODA includes spend to specific countries or regions (sections 4.1.1-4.1.4) as well as spend to multiple countries and/or regions[footnote 10]. Figure 18 shows the top 15 recipient countries of total ODA from the DAC donor countries in 2018 and the UKs share of ODA in these recipient countries. 2019: The Americas received 244 million of UK bilateral ODA in 2019, a decrease of 111 million or 31.3% compared to 2018 (Figure 4). The UK was spending approximately 0.43 percent on foreign aid a decade ago and 0.57 as recently as 2012. The UK provided the largest share of total DAC donor ODA to Pakistan (34%), three of the top 15 DAC ODA recipients received 5 per cent or less of their total ODA from the UK. 3 minutes read. the UK Government) or their executive agencies, where each transaction meets the following requirements: The list of countries eligible to receive ODA is set by the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC). This is an increase compared to 2018 when 38.7% (3,579m) of bilateral ODA was not assigned to a single benefitting country or region. The nation paid 1 out of every 8 in foreign aid given by 29 major countries, figures reveal. The United States is by far the largest single foreign donor. By Jennifer Scott, political reporter. It shows the UK sent the most foreign aid to Pakistan in 2015, while UK foreign aid to India rounded off the top 10 at 150.4 million. Government departments other than FCDO will provide project-level details that allow the ODA spend to be quality assured by FCDO statisticians. Section 2 - largest donors and recipients in a region. Figure 2: Total UK ODA by main delivery channel (%), 2015-2019. Following the merger, the ODA statistics team will review the SID in light of this, including how to present and communicate ODA trends for reporting on 2020 ODA and beyond. Charities accuse chancellor of stealth raid on aid. Other = Other government departments: Department of Health and Social, Prosperity Cross-Government Fund, HM Treasury, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Department for Work and Pensions, Department for Education, HM Revenue and Customs, Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sports, Ministry of Defence, and Office for National Statistics, Department for International Trade. In Table 3, 27.5 million for the UKs assessed contribution to ODA eligible EU civilian peacekeeping missions is reported in these statistics by the Conflict, Stability and Security Fund, as the fund responsible for spending.
Prosun Tanning Beds,
5 Importance Of Taking Body Measurements,
Larry Huggins Basketball,
Newcastle Council Housing Application Form,
Articles U